Many of the comments to my most recent What Would You Do Series got me thinking about ethical decision-making. For example, in response to a scenario in which a hutner sees a wounded buck but doesn’t have the proper tag to harvest the buck, Kris from Jake’s Outdoors wrote:
I hate to see any animal suffering, but i would have to do as the rest have already said: let him walk. Like Othmar [Outdoors with Othmar], I will not do anything that endangers my hunting privilege. Like Chris [Penn’s Outdoors] said, I don’t know too many game wardens who would accept this as an excuse for shooting a deer.
Echoing these sentiments, everyone else who replied (including myself) decided going with the law was the best way to go (other respondents included the likes of Arthur [Simply Outdoors], Rick [Tails & Trails], Matt [Bright Idea Outdoors], Brad [Southern Adventures], Marc [NYBowhunter], and Marian [Marian’s Hunting Stories].
What does that say about hunting culture? While many people seem to agree that shooting the wounded animal would be the most ethical think to do, we all seemed to go with the most legal route. Now, I realize that my little blog comments don’t represent the whole hunting culture, but I think we might be onto something here. Let me explain…
A Little Psychology For You…
A developmental psychologist named Lawrence Kohlberg theorized that humans develop through different stages of moral development. I’ll save you all the details, but basically, he said that the way we respond to ethical dilemnas reflect our moral development. The most matured levels of development, according to Kohlberg, involved ignoring the law and doing what’s right. Examples of people who may have reached this stage include people like Martin Luther King, Jr. He ignored the law to better our world.
Is there a place for this in Hunting?
I hope so, but I know I don’t want to risk my hunting privileges (my hunting excursions are already too far and few between)…so how can I expect it from others?
But wait…maybe it goes beyond individuals?
Hmmm…what could I mean here. Ideally, we wouldn’t have to worry about telling the truth. That is, if I honestly shoot an animal for the better of the world, and not just because I wanted to (i.e., harvesting a wounded buck), and I then took this deer to the game warden to report it — in an ideal world this would all check out smoothly. Unfortunately, our hunting culture is infiltrated with 1- selfish liars…which leads to 2- wardens who are out to get us. (I know “out to get us” is a negative term…but my run-ins with wardens have been mostly negative - and for no good reason).
Conclusion:
It is hard to do good in a culture that focuses on the negative…and unfortunately our hunting culture reflect the culture of society (one in which we are punished for wrongdoings much more than we are rewarded for good deeds). Even so, I hope that someday I am able to find a balance between these two - doing what’s right — even if I can find a way to bend the law!
development, ethics, hunting, Kohlberg, law, morals, Psychology of Hunting, theory, truthIf you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!